AI training fair use meets its first U.S. appellate test: on September 29 the Third Circuit ruled that a non-generative AI ...
The Third Circuit held that Westlaw headnotes are copyrightable and ROSS’s use of those headnotes to train a competing legal-research platform was not fair use. The court applied traditional copyright ...
The Trump administration stepped formally into the most consequential copyright fight in artificial intelligence history on September 1, 2026, filing a brief in federal court that declared training ...
In Thomson Reuters v. ROSS, the Third Circuit recently affirmed the district court’s partial summary judgment for Thomson Reuters, holding that ...
The US Court of Appeals ruled for Thomson Reuters and against AI legal research company ROSS Intelligence on September ...
Last week saw two landmark fair use decisions on artificial intelligence from the Northern District of California: Judge William Alsup’s decision in Bartz v. Anthropic and Judge Vince Chhabria’s ...
Two judges in the Northern District of California recently issued groundbreaking summary judgment rulings regarding whether an artificial intelligence company’s scraping and ingestion of copyrighted ...
This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more. This voice experience is generated by AI. Learn more. Round Hill Music, an independent publisher with a $1.1 billion catalog, has filed two major ...
Fair use is a concept in US copyright law that was created to balance the exclusive rights of copyright owners and the needs of everyday users of copyrighted material. Fair use of copyrighted works, ...