The U.S. Supreme Court very recently granted certiorari in Suncor Energy v. Boulder on the question of whether federal law ...

More than two dozen contributors to the manual criticized the deletion of a chapter on climate science by the Federal ...

Removing the climate science chapter advances neither science nor the law. It only deprives judges of a resource needed to do their jobs.

Last month, a government agency erased climate change from a manual that helps federal and state judges understand complex science in court. The political attack on the nonpartisan publication “should ...

The research arm of the federal judiciary announced it would remove a controversial climate-centric section from the latest edition of its influential scientific-evidence guide for judges, days after ...

A majority of the contributors to the federal judiciary's reference manual on scientific evidence accused court officials on ...

An ad hoc committee developed the third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence in collaboration with the Federal Judicial Center, which produced the previous editions, to assist judges ...

Republican attorneys general argued the new chapter would put judges “firmly on one side” of climate lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry. The climate science section of a new judicial reference ...