Mere Excise Registration Lapse Not Wilful Suppression If Dept. Knew About Unit: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court on 25 September held that the extended five-year limitation period under the proviso to Section 11-A ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that a statutory demand notice sent by registered post to the correct address of a cheque ...
On 29 September, the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) held that outdoor playground equipment and outdoor gym ...
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that electricity rates actually paid by an assessee's ...
An Indian-registered vehicle does not become a fresh foreign import merely because it is brought back to India in a shipping ...
The Delhi High Court has questioned the Income Tax Department over the issuance of two Permanent Account Numbers (PANs) in ...
The Delhi High Court on Thursday reserved judgment in Vedanta Ltd.'s appeal challenging the July 22, 2026 judgment of a ...
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has upheld an order setting aside a ₹2.63 crore service tax demand against the ...
The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with a 2003 show cause notice issued by the Customs Department to Mangali ...
The Madras High Court on 30 September dismissed Rio Children's Hospital Pvt Ltd's plea to transfer its trade mark ...
The Bombay High Court has held that Section 110A of the Customs Act does not prescribe a uniform security for provisional ...
The Patna High Court has directed the Central GST and Central Excise Department to refund ₹1,24,175 to a petitioner after finding that the amount paid towards the mandatory pre-deposit for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results