The Supreme Court received unusually high media attention this session as it tackled multiple controversies and ...
Two of the three recommendations have their parent High Courts of Allahabad; one recommendation hails from Jharkhand ...
All eyes are on the ECI but an aberration at the Supreme Court draws attention to larger bench references Petitioners had argued that the 2023 Act failed to ensure an independent mechanism for ...
The Supreme Court held that it is its duty to adopt restorative measures that mitigate environmental degradation and prioritise mitigation of future risk to the environment. In 2024, the Supreme Court ...
The Court directed transfer of investigation and departmental proceedings where police violate constitutional safeguards ...
The Supreme Court allows Karnataka to grant leases covering virgin forest before authorities approve mining there.
The Supreme Court’s decision on the 3-year practice criteria marks a step back in disability jurisprudence ...
Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court 21 January 2025 Chief Justice of the Telangana High Court 23 July 2023 to 20 January 2025 Acting Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court3 July 2022 to 14 ...
Do India’s statutory and policy measures, including the Environment Protection Act, 1986, provide adequate and enforceable responses to the climate crisis? Pandey then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Justice Datta’s 54-page opinion starts with the Attorney General’s argument about the writ petitions raising a substantial question of law on constitutional interpretation requiring a reference to a ...
Appearing for the petitioner, Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan said the notices did not tell voters what they needed to clarify. Justice Bagchi observed, “Almost mechanically notices are being issued.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results